Australian Capital Territory Bills Explanatory Statements
[Index]
[Search]
[Download]
[Bill]
[Help]
CRIMES (INDUSTRIAL MANSLAUGHTER) AMENDMENT BILL 2002
2002
THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
Crimes
(Industrial Manslaughter) Amendment Bill
2002
Explanatory
Memorandum
Circulated by authority
of
Simon Corbell
MLA
Minister for Industrial
Relations
OverviewThis
Bill amends the Crimes Act 1900 to provide improved protection of the
health and safety of workers by establishing new offences of industrial
manslaughter. The offences will apply where an employer or senior officer of an
employer causes the death of a worker through recklessness or negligence.
The Bill provides for substantial penalties
where an offence is committed. The Bill also provides for new financial
penalties which can be applied to either natural persons or corporations and
allows the court to order corporations to take actions including publicising the
offence, notifying specified persons of the offence, or carrying out a specified
project for the public interest.Financial
ImplicationsNil.Clause
1 Name of ActThis is a formal provision
specifying the short title of the Act.Clause 2
CommencementThis is a formal provision
specifying when the Act commences operation.
Clause 3 Act
amended
This is a formal provision specifying the name of the
Act that is amended.
Clause 4 Section 7A, note
1
This provision amends a note in the Crimes
Act to explain that chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to the employer and
senior officer offences of industrial manslaughter. The chapter sets out the
general principles of criminal responsibility (including corporate criminal
responsibility, burdens of proof and general defences), and defines terms used
for offences to which the Code applies (e.g. conduct, intention and
recklessness).
Clause 5 New part 2A
Industrial Manslaughter
Clause 5 inserts a new
part into the Act. The part provides for the offences of industrial
manslaughter.
Section 49A defines certain
words and expressions used in part 2A, in
particular:
“Agent” means a person
engaged (as an independent contractor or otherwise) to provide services to
another person (the first person) in relation to matters over which the first
person has control or would have had control but for any agreement between them.
Agent also means a person engaged (as an independent contractor or otherwise) by
another agent, or by an agent of the agent, to provide services in relation to
the first person regarding matters over which the other agent has control or
would have had control but for any agreement between the agents. The term agent
is used in the definition of employer in section
49A.
“Employee” means a person
engaged under a contract of
service.
“Employer” means a person
who employs or engages a worker directly or through an agent. An employer can
be an incorporated entity, a government entity or an unincorporated
entity.
An entity is a “government
entity” in relation to a function of the entity where the function is
subject to the control of a government (including a senior officer of the
government as defined in this part) or is otherwise an agent of a government in
exercising the function.
“Independent
contractor” means a person engaged under a contract for
services.
“Officer” means an
officer of a corporation as defined in section 9 of the Corporations Act
2001(Cth). This term is used in the definition of “senior
officer” in section
49A.
“Outworker” means a worker
engaged by a principal under a contract for services to treat or manufacture
articles or materials or to perform other services in the outworker’s own
home or on other premises not under the control or management of the
principal.
In relation to an employer that is a
government or a government entity, “senior officer” means a
Minister, a chief executive officer, or an executive who makes, or takes part in
making, decisions affecting all or a substantial part of the functions of the
government or government entity’s functions. In relation to an employer
that is a corporation, “senior officer” means an officer of the
corporation. In relation to an employer that is an entity which is neither a
government entity or a corporation, such as an unincorporated association,
“senior officer” means an executive who makes, or takes part in
making, decisions affecting all or a substantial part, of the functions of the
entity, or a person who would be an officer if the entity were a
corporation.
“Volunteer” means a person who performs work
for another person or organisation and receives no payment (other than
out-of-pocket expenses). This includes work performed for another person’s
trade or business, or for a religious, educational, charitable, benevolent or
other public interest
organisation.
“Worker” means an
employee, independent contractor, outworker, apprentice, trainee or volunteer.
49B Omissions of employers and senior
officers
Section 49B provides that conduct, for
the purposes of the new industrial manslaughter offences, includes an omission
to act by the employer or a senior officer of the employer if it is an omission
to perform the duty to avoid or prevent danger to the life, safety or health of
a worker.
Section 49B further provides that
the danger must arise from an act of the employer or senior officer, from
anything in the employer’s or senior officer’s possession or
control, or from any undertaking of the employer or senior
officer.
Subsection 49B(3) provides that if,
apart from an agreement between a person and someone else, something would have
been in the person’s control, this agreement must be disregarded and the
thing must be taken to be in the person’s control. This section prevents
the making of agreements to set aside a duty to avoid or prevent danger to the
life, safety or health of a worker.
Section 49B
is consistent with Chapter 5 of the Model Criminal
Code.
49C Industrial manslaughter-employer
offence
Section 49C creates an offence where
the conduct of an employer causes the death of a worker.
The terms “employer” and
“worker” are defined broadly in section 49A. There may be cases
where more than one person is capable of being the employer of a dead worker for
the purposes of this section. For instance, where contracting arrangements are
used in a workplace, it is intended that in addition to the direct employer of
the worker, principal contractors and other sub-contractors further up the chain
of responsibility could be found responsible for the death of the worker.
The offence will only apply if the worker was
killed (or suffered injuries that later led to the worker’s death) in the
course of his or her employment. In the case of workers who are not employees,
such as independent contractors or outworkers, the death or injuries that led to
death must occur in the course of the person’s engagement as an
independent contractor or outworker.
An
employer will only commit the offence if the employer’s conduct caused
(substantially contributed to) the worker’s death and the employer’s
conduct was either reckless or negligent.
In
cases where the employer’s conduct is reckless, the new offence will apply
if the employer was reckless as to causing serious harm to the worker. If the
employer was reckless as to causing death to the worker, other offences such as
murder under the Crimes Act will apply.
In
cases where the employer’s conduct is negligent as to causing the death of
the worker, the new offence will apply.
In
cases where the employer intentionally causes the death of a worker, other
offences such as murder under the Crimes Act will
apply.
The elements of the employer offence are
modeled on the fatal offences provisions set out in Chapter 5 of the Model
Criminal Code.
The maximum penalty for the
offence is 2 500 penalty units or imprisonment for 25 years or both.
49D Industrial manslaughter-senior officer
offence
Section 49D creates an offence where
the conduct of a senior officer of an employer causes the death of a worker.
The offence will only apply if the worker was
killed (or suffered injuries that later led to the worker’s death) in the
course of his or her employment. In the case of workers who are not employees,
such as independent contractors or outworkers, the death or injuries that led to
death must occur in the course of the person’s engagement as an
independent contractor or outworker.
A senior
officer will only commit the offence if the senior officer’s conduct
caused (substantially contributed to) the worker’s death and the senior
officer’s conduct was either reckless or
negligent.
In cases where the senior
officer’s conduct is reckless, the new offence will apply if the senior
officer was reckless as to causing serious harm to the worker. If the senior
officer was reckless as to causing death to the worker, other offences such as
murder under the Crimes Act will apply.
In
cases where the senior officer’s conduct is negligent as to causing the
death of the worker, the new offence will apply.
In cases where the senior officer
intentionally causes the death of a worker, other offences such as murder under
the Crimes Act will apply.
The elements of the
senior officer offence are modeled on the fatal offences provisions set out in
Chapter 5 of the Model Criminal Code.
The
maximum penalty for the offence is 2 500 penalty units or imprisonment for 25
years or both.
49E Court may order
corporation to take certain actions
Section 49E provides that where a court finds a
corporation guilty of an offence against section 49C (employer offence), that in
addition to or instead of any other penalty imposed, the court may order a
corporation to take specified actions. These are
• to publicise the offence, any deaths or other
consequences relating to the conduct from which the offence arose, and the
sentence imposed;
• to notify a specified person or persons, such as
shareholders;
• to perform specified acts or
establish and/or carry out a specified project for the public benefit. In the
case of the latter, the project can be unrelated to the offence.
Subsection 49E(3) provides that the court may
specify a period within which the order must be completed and may also impose
any other requirements that it considers necessary or expedient for enforcement
of the order or to make the order effective.
Subsection 49E(4) provides that the total cost
to the corporation of compliance with orders under section 49E cannot be more
than $5 million including any fine imposed for the offence.
Subsections 49E(5) and 49E(6) provide that in
making an order under section 49E, the court must take into account, as far as
practicable, the financial circumstances of the corporation and the burden that
the order will impose. The court is not prevented, however, from making an
order if it has been unable to ascertain the financial circumstances of the
corporation.
Subsections 49E(7) and 49E(8)
provide that if a corporation fails, without reasonable excuse, to comply with
an order under subsection (2)(a) or (b), the court may on application of the
commissioner for OH&S, order the commissioner to carry out the order and to
publicise the failure of the corporation to do so. The commissioner must comply
with such an order.
Subsection 49E(9)
provides that an order to the commissioner under subsection 49E(7) does not
prevent contempt of court proceedings against a corporation that has failed to
comply with an order under this
section.
Subsection 49E(10) provides that
reasonable costs incurred by the commissioner of complying with an order under
subsection 49E(7) will be a debt owed to the Territory by the
corporation.
Clause 6
Dictionary
The dictionary is amended to insert
signpost definitions to the terms defined in the new part 2A.
[Index]
[Search]
[Download]
[Bill]
[[Help]]