In deciding whether building work has been done in a proper way, the following considerations must be taken into account:
(a) whether the work uses a product or system in accordance with any accessible instructions, directions, guidelines or suggestions of the maker or seller of the product or system;
Examples of instructions that are not accessible
1 instructions not in English
2 an information leaflet printed 10 years ago that is now unavailable
Note An example is part of the regulations , is not exhaustive and may extend, but does not limit, the meaning of the provision in which it appears (see Legislation Act, s 126 and s 132).
(b) whether the work is in accordance with any relevant rules or guidelines published by Standards Australia;
(c) whether, as part of the work, a product or system is being, or has been, used in a way that a reasonable person would expect is contrary to the intended use of the product or system;
(d) whether, as part of the work, a product or system is being, or has been, used in a way that the maker has given written notice will void the maker's warranty;
Example of use
Installing roof sheeting so it is level at any point is use in a way that a reasonable person would expect to be contrary to the intended use of the sheeting if the manufacturer's published literature indicates that the sheeting's warranty is voided if the sheeting is installed at a fall of less than 1° off level.
(e) whether a reasonable person doing the work would know or reasonably suspect that the use of a product or system in a particular way would cause more instability, or affect the durability or soundness of the product or system or of the building work than if the product or system were used appropriately;
(f) how reasonable it is in all the circumstances for the user of a product or system to rely on the maker's statement that the product or system complies with a stated standard;
(g) whether the building work contravenes the Act or another Territory law.