ACT Numbered Regulations - Explanatory Statements ACT Numbered Regulations - Explanatory Statements[Index] [Search] [Download] [Related Items] [Help]
COURT PROCEDURES AMENDMENT RULES 2011 (NO 2) (NO 17 OF 2011)
The Rule-Making Committee (currently comprising the Chief Justice,
President Gray, Justice Refshauge, Chief Magistrate Burns and Magistrate
Dingwall) may make rules in relation to the practice and procedure of ACT courts
and their registries pursuant to section 7 of the Court Procedures Act 2004.
From the time of commencement of the
Court Procedures Rules 2006, the Courts and the Joint Rules Advisory
Committee have conducted a continuous and consultative review of the rules.
This process has resulted in the amendments contained in the Court Procedures
Amendment Rules 2011 (No 2).
Civil jurisdiction
In
response to representation from the profession, the rules relating to notices
for non-party production have been reviewed and streamlined so as to provide
clearer guidance to both applicants and respondents with respect to such
notices. Rule 662 has been substantially overhauled and replaced with a version
which outlines the obligations of all parties involved. Rule 664 has also been
amended removing the need to file and serve an affidavit supporting any
objection to production unless specifically requested by the other party.
Consistent with these changes, Form 2.27 has also been amended to better reflect
the requirements of compliance with the notice imposed upon a
non-party.
A new Division 2.14.1B provides for a procedure for the
removal of applications from ACAT to the Supreme Court under section 83 of the
ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2008. A further new Division
3.11.3 provides for a procedure for cost assessments under the Legal
Profession Act 2006, with a new originating application Form 3.47. This
procedure is similar to that of cost assessments under Part 2.17 of the
Rules.
Minor amendments have also been made to the costs penalty rule in
Rule 1722, which has been adjusted to take into account the increase in the
civil jurisdiction of the Magistrates Court. Similar adjustments have been made
to costs amounts in Schedule 3, Tables 3.1 and 3.2. Minor amendments have also
been made in Part 3.1 of the Rules, relating to the probate jurisdiction of the
Court, providing for the Public Trustee of the ACT to be able to file a
certified copy of an original Will kept in electronic form by the Public
Trustee. Further amendments have been made throughout the Rules and in adoption
forms substituting the reference to the Chief Executive with the
Director-General, reflecting the recent changes in government departments and
heads of departments. The Scale of Costs in Schedule 4 has also been amended to
provide for an increase across all items.
Supreme Court criminal
jurisdiction
The Bail Amendment Act 2011 commenced on 16 May
2011. The Court Procedures Amendment Rules 2011 (No 2) makes amendments
to the rules in Division 4.3.3 and to the approved bail application forms to
reflect the changes in the Bail Act. In particular, rule 4721 has been expanded
to require further evidence to meet the criteria under sections 20C, 43 or 43A,
as applicable.
The amended form 4.8 (Supreme Court application in relation to bail) requires the applicant to state the section of the Bail Act under which the application is being made (section 20B, 43 or 43A), and no longer requires the grounds of the application to be repeated in the application. The grounds are to be set out in the affidavit.
The approved form of affidavit in support of an application for bail is to be repealed. Applicants will need to draft an affidavit in support that is relevant to the type of application being made under the Bail Act, and which complies with the rules in Division 4.3.3 and in particular, rule 4721.
Rule 4723 has been introduced to provide for a simplified form of application for unrepresented accused persons and a new Form 4.9 has been introduced for that purpose, requiring a declaration at the end of the application rather than a supporting affidavit.
A new Form 4.15 – Supreme Court special hearing – notice by guardian - is to be used when an accused person has been found unfit to plead, a guardian has been appointed and the guardian wishes to notify the Court under section 316(2) of the Crimes Act 1900 that, in his or her opinion, it is in the best interests of the accused for the special hearing to be a trial by a single judge without a jury. This new form takes the place of the Election for judge alone trial (Form 4.11) in these particular circumstances.