[Index] [Search] [Download] [Related Items] [Help]
LAND (PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT) AMENDMENT REGULATIONS 2004 (NO 1) (NO 12 OF 2004)
2004
THE
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBY FOR THE
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL
TERRITORY
LAND
(PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT) AMENDMENT REGULATIONS
2004 (No
1)
Subordinate Law No. 12
of 2004
EXPLANATORY
STATEMENT
Circulated by authority of
Mr Simon Corbell
MLA
Minister for Planning
LAND (PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT) AMENDMENT REGULATIONS 2004
(No 1)
These are new regulations under the Land (Planning and
Environment) Act 1991.
On the 31 March 2004 Justice Crispin of the Supreme Court of the
Australian Capital Territory handed down a decision in matter No. SC 204 of
2004. What was before the court was an application for an injunction to restrain
what was alleged to involve a threatened breach of section 225 of the Land
(Planning and Environment) Act 1991 by certain work (the Gungahlin Drive
Extension) on an area of land (designated area) between Lyneham and
O’Connor in the Australian Capital Territory. In the matter before it,
the court was asked to determine whether relevant Commonwealth legislation
(Australian Capital Territory (Planning and Land Management) Act 1988)
had the effect of permitting works to be undertaken in designated areas with the
approval of the National Capital Authority without further approval under
Territory legislation.
These regulations clarify the position with
respect to approvals, exclusion of appeals and consequential matters concerning
the Gungahlin Drive Extension.
Clause 1 provides that the name of the Regulations is the Land
(Planning and Environment) Amendment Regulations 2004 (No
1).
Clause 2 provides that the regulations commence on
the day after the notification day.
Clause 3 notes that the
regulations amend the Land (Planning and Environment) Regulations
1992.
Clause 4 provides for a new regulation 4A which deals
with the application of the amendments and a date of expiration with respect to
this particular regulation.
Clause 5 substitutes a new clause 40
(4) (b) and is essentially a redrafting of that provision.
Clause 6
is new regulations 40 (5) and (6) these regulations specifically address the
issues raised by the Supreme Court judgment.
Clause 7 omits
regulation 41 (3).
Clause 8 provides a new heading for regulation
42.
Clause 9 inserts a new regulation 42 (3) to (5) these
regulations quite specifically deal with aspects relevant to the Gungahlin Drive
Extension.
Clause 10 provides for a new heading for regulation
43.
Clause 11 substitutes for regulation 43 (3) regulations 43 (3)
(4) and (5). Both regulations 42 (5) and 43 (5) provide for sunset periods with
respect to the Gungahlin Drive Extension provisions of five
years.
Clause 12 omits from schedule 1 item 31.
Clause 13
substitutes a new schedule 6 heading.
Clause 14 substitutes a new
schedule 6 item 2.
Clause 15 substitutes a new schedule 7
heading.
Clause 16 substitutes a new schedule 7 item 2.
Nil