[Index] [Search] [Download] [Related Items] [Help]
MAGISTRATES COURT (PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT INFRINGEMENT NOTICES) REGULATION 2008 (NO 11 OF 2008)
2008
THE
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
MAGISTRATES COURT (PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
INFRINGEMENT NOTICES) REGULATION 2008
SUBORDINATE LAW
SL2008-11
EXPLANATORY
STATEMENT
Presented by
Mr Simon Corbell MLA
Attorney
General
Part 3.8 of the Magistrates Court Act 1930 provides that offences
prescribed under a regulation made under that Act can be dealt with by way of an
infringement notice. The Magistrates Court (Planning and Development
Infringement Notices)
Regulation 2008 is to be made under that
Act and will enable infringement notices to be issued for a number of offences
under the Planning and Development Act 2007.
• a person undertakes development without development approval under the Planning and Development Act 2007 and under that Act the development requires development approval;
• a person undertakes development, and the development is prohibited by the Planning and Development Act 2007;
• a person undertakes development, for which the person has a conditional development approval under the Planning and Development Act 2007, and the person does not comply with a condition of the development approval when undertaking the development;
• the planning and land authority gives a controlled activity order to a person, requiring the person to do, or not do, something stated in the order, and the person contravenes the order;
• under the Planning and Development Act 2007 the planning and land authority directs a person to carry out rectification work in relation to a controlled activity, and the person contravenes the direction;
• under the Planning and Development Act 2007 the planning and land authority directs a prohibition notice to the person, and the notice states that an activity must not be carried on by the person in relation to a place, and the person carries on the activity, or caries on the activity otherwise than in accordance with the notice, in relation to the place;
• under the Planning and Development Act 2007an inspector lawfully requires a person to state the person’s name and home address and the person fails to comply with the requirement;
Clause 1—Name of Regulation—provides that the
Regulation is called—Magistrates Court (Planning and Development
Infringement Notices) Regulation 2008.
Clause 2—Commencement—provides that the regulation
commences upon the commencement of the Planning and Development Act 2007,
section 428 (Repeals), and provides in a note that the naming and commencement
provisions automatically commence on the notification day (see Legislation Act,
s 75 (1)).
It is necessary to delay commencement of the regulation until
the commencement of the above-mentioned section 148, as that section has the
effect of repealing laws that the Planning and Development Act 2007 will
make redundant, repeal and replace.
Clause 3—Purpose of
Regulation—provides that the purpose of the regulation is to allow for
infringement notices under the Magistrates Court Act 1930, part 3.8 for
certain offences against the Planning and Development Act 2007. See the
Magistrates Court Act 1930, part 3.8, for how it provides a system of
infringement notices for offences against various Acts. The infringement notice
system is intended to provide an alternative to prosecution.
Section
4—Dictionary—provides that the dictionary at the end of
the regulation is part of the regulation. The dictionary defines certain terms
used in the regulation. A definition in the dictionary applies to the entire
regulation unless the definition, or another provision of the regulation,
provides otherwise or the contrary intention otherwise appears (see the
Legislation Act, s 155 and s 156 (1)).
Clause
5—Notes—provides that a note included in the regulation is, in
law, not part of the regulation; it is purely explanatory.
Clause
6—Administering authority—provides that the planning and
land authority is the administering authority in relation to the issue
of infringement notices under the regulation. Under the Legislation Act
2001, dictionary, part 1, that term is defined as
follows—
planning and land authority means the
Planning and Land Authority established under the Planning and Land Act 2002.
However, an uncommenced amendment in the Planning and Development (Consequential Amendments) Act 2007, schedule 1, amendment 1.98, proposes to amend that definition as follows—
[1.98] Dictionary, part 1, definition of planning and land authority
substitute
planning and land authority means the Planning and Land Authority established under the Planning and Development Act 2007.
It is intended that that amendment commence on or before the commencement of
the regulation, and that amended definition will define the relevant term for
the purposes of clause 6 of the regulation.
Clause
7—Infringement notice offences—provides that The
Magistrates Court
Act 1930, part 3.8 applies to an offence
against a provision of the Planning and Development Act 2007
mentioned in the regulation at schedule 1, column 2.
Clause
8—Infringement notice penalties—provides that the
penalties for an offence under a relevant infringement notice for an individual
is prescribed in schedule 1, column 4, of the regulation and that the respective
penalty for a corporation in that circumstance is 5 times the amount prescribed
in column 4. For example if schedule 1, column 4, prescribes and amount of
$1200, the amount payable by an individual under the notice is $1200 and the
amount payable by a corporation is 5 x $1200 = $6000.
The section also
prescribes that the cost of service a relevant reminder notice under the
Magistrates Court Act 1930, for a relevant infringement notice offence is
$34. That is the amount payable by the person to whom the reminder notice is
issued.
Clause 9—Contents of infringement
notices—other information—provides for additional
information, other than the offence and penalty, which must be provided in a
relevant infringement notice. The additional information is as
follows—
for an infringement notice served on a company—the
company’s ACN.
The requirement is additional to the requirement
under the Magistrates Court Act 1930, s 121 (1) (c).
The clause
also provides that for the clause the term company means a company
registered under the Corporations Act 2001 (Commonwealth).
It is
intended that the term ACN means, for a company registered under
the Corporations Act 2001 (Commonwealth),—the Australian company
number assigned to the company under that Act.
Clause
10—Contents of infringement notices—identifying
authorised person—provides that the infringement notice must fully
identify the authorised person. Such identification could be by stating the
authorised person’s full name or the person’s surname and initials,
or by stating a unique number given, for the regulation, to the authorised
person by the administering authority.
Clause 11—Contents
of reminder notices—identifying authorised
person—provides that a reminder notice must fully identify the
authorised person. Such identification could be by stating the
authorised person’s full name or the person’s surname and initials,
or by stating a unique number given, for the regulation, to the authorised
person by the administering authority.
Clause
12—Authorised people for infringement notice
offences—prescribes that an inspector may serve a
relevant infringement notice and a relevant reminder notice under the
regulation. The term PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT 2007.
Schedule
1—prescribes the relevant offences under PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT ACT
2007, and respective infringement notice penalties under the regulation.
Schedule 1, column 2, prescribes the reference to the offence provision of the
relevant law. For example, schedule 1, part 1.1 (Planning and Development Act
2007), item 1, column 2, prescribes offence provision “155 (2)”,
which is a reference to the offence provision at subsection 155 (2) of the
Planning and Development Act 2004.
The infringement notice
penalty amounts prescribed in the regulation schedule1, column 4, are intended
to represent 20% of the respective maximum penalty provided for the offence,
which reflects general legal policy in the absence of compelling reasons to
depart from that magnitude of penalty.