[Index] [Search] [Download] [Related Items] [Help]
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT (LEASE VARIATION CHARGE EXEMPTION) AMENDMENT REGULATION 2016 (NO 1) (NO 6 OF 2016)
2016
LEGISLATIVE
ASSEMBLY FOR THE
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL
TERRITORY
Planning and Development (Lease
Variation Charge Exemption) Amendment Regulation 2016 (No
1)
SL2016-6
EXPLANATORY
STATEMENT
Presented by
Mick Gentleman MLA
Minister for Planning and Land Management
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
This explanatory statement relates to the Planning and Development (Lease
Variation Charge Exemption) Amendment Regulation 2016 (No 1) as presented to the
ACT Legislative Assembly. It has been prepared in order to assist the reader of
the amending regulation and to help inform debate on it. It does not form part
of the amending regulation and has not been endorsed by the Assembly.
The
statement is to be read in conjunction with the amending regulation. It is not,
and is not meant to be, a comprehensive description of the amending regulation.
What is said about a provision is not to be taken as an authoritative guide to
the meaning of a provision: this is a task for the courts.
Background
The University of Canberra (the University) opened in
1968 as the Canberra College of Advanced Education, the first centre for adult
education (CAE) in Australia. In 1990, the University was re‐created as a
university as a part of national educational reforms. Today the University is
one of the major tertiary education establishments within the Australian Capital
Territory (ACT) and Australia.
As a highly competitive market, elite
universities around Australia and the world provide a range of high quality
services and facilities to attract the best students and staff. These
facilities include not only educational and residential accommodation but also
industry and convenient commercial services. Recognising the shift in the types
of services and facilities contemporary universities are providing staff,
students and the wider community, the University has prepared a campus master
plan which sets out the future vision for the campus.
The University is
a unique case in terms of land use planning as it is one of the few lessees in
the ACT to have its own Act: the University of Canberra Act 1989 (the UC
Act). The UC Act sets out the powers and functions of the University. Due to
the University’s importance to Canberra, the UC Act requires involvement
of the ACT Government with respect to certain functions, such as appointment to
the University Council. As such, the ACT Government has a relatively large
degree of control over the University when compared to almost all other
development within the ACT.
However, Planning and Development Act
2007 (the Act) continues to apply to the University with the University
required to seek development approval for development proposals contemplated by
the campus master plan and permitted by the Territory
Plan.
Overview
Developments undertaken by the University of
Canberra require a development application (DA) under the Act. Some
developments allowed by the territory plan may not be allowed by the lease. In
these circumstances, the lease would need to be varied if the lessee wants to
seek approval to undertake the development. A lease variation is
“development” for the purposes of the Act (s7 (1) (f)) meaning a
development application (DA) for development approval is required unless exempt
from requiring approval under s133 of the Act (and s20 of the Planning and
Development Regulation 2008 (the regulation)). Under s276B of the Act, the
authority must not execute a chargeable variation of a nominal rent lease unless
the lessee has paid the Territory the Lease Variation Charge (LVC) for the
variation. If the lease variation is for approval of a s277 chargeable
variation of a nominal rent lease, s 139(2)(h) of the Act requires that a DA for
such a variation must be accompanied by a valuation report prepared by an
accredited valuer that works out the amounts represented by V1 and
V2 as defined in s 277 of the Act.
The only exemptions to LVC currently relate to boundary realignments, a variation where the only effect of the variation is to remove the concessional status of the lease, variation of a holding lease and secondary residences. Section 276 of the Act provides, amongst other things, that a variation of a lease can be excluded from being a chargeable variation if it is prescribed by regulation (s276(c)) and section 170 of the regulation prescribes -
(a) a variation of a holding lease; and
(b) a variation to authorise the use of the land under the lease for a secondary residence.
The amending regulation gives effect to the Government’s policy position as set out in the Agreement of Strategic Intent dated 4 March 2015. In that Agreement the Government indicated that “...it is not seeking to impose a tax or other value capture mechanism in relation to the Agreed initiatives.” Lease variation charge is a mechanism to capture value uplift when a lease variation that delivers increased rights is approved.
Further, under the Financial Management Act 2001 the Treasurer can exercise a power under section 131 to waiver any determined LVC in full or part. The amending regulation negates the need to exercise this power.
However, because variation of a perpetual Crown lease held by the University of Canberra is not exempt from the definition of a “chargeable variation” under section 276 of the Act, the planning and land authority (the authority) is required to go through the process of assessing and determining the LVC.
The amending regulation inserts a 3rd type of lease variation in section 170 – a variation of a perpetual Crown lease held by the University of Canberra. This means that a Development Application to vary the University’s perpetual Crown lease does not need to be accompanied by a valuation report as required by s 139(2)(h) of the Act and the authority does not have to go through the process of assessing and determining the LVC.
The amending regulation therefore provides many benefits – for the Government, because the authority does not have to go through an administrative process for an outcome that would result in no LVC being paid, and for the University, which benefits from savings in valuation expenses and a lease variation being processed more efficiently.
Regulatory impact statement
The Legislation Act 2001
section 36(1) states in part:
(1) A regulatory impact statement need not be prepared for a proposed
subordinate law or disallowable instrument (the proposed law) if the proposed
law only provides for, or to the extent it only provides for:
(b) a matter
that does not operate to the disadvantage of anyone (other than the Territory or
a territory authority or instrumentality) by—
(i) adversely affecting the person’s rights; or
(ii) imposing liabilities on the person;
(k) an amendment of a fee, charge or tax consistent with announced government policy.
In this case, a regulatory impact statement is not required. This is
because the regulation does not adversely affect any rights and does not impose
liabilities. The regulation instead provides the advantage of reducing the need
to go through an administrative process where the outcome would be the same as
it would be without the regulation. The regulation also operates to the benefit
of the community by negating the need to do an administrative process for no
benefit. Resources can instead be directed to necessary projects.
Outline of Provisions
Clause 1 Name of regulation
This clause names the amending
regulation as the Planning and Development (Lease Variation Charge Exemption)
Amendment Regulation 2016 (No 1).
Clause 2
Commencement
This clause states that the amending regulation commences
on the day after its notification.
Clause 3 Legislation
amended
This clause notes that the amending regulation amends the
Planning and Development Regulation 2008.
Clause 4 New section
170(c)
This clause inserts a new section 170(c) in section 170 which
provides that a variation of a perpetual Crown lease held by the University of
Canberra is exempt from the definition of a chargeable variation under section
276 of the Act.
This means that the authority does not have to go
through the process of assessing and determining the LVC when the University of
Canberra successfully applies for approval of a development proposal that
involves a lease variation.
The same LVC outcome is achieved by the
exemption as without the exemption. The benefit to the community is that the
exemption means resources can instead be used productively elsewhere.