[Index] [Search] [Download] [Related Items] [Help]
PUBLIC HEALTH AMENDMENT REGULATION 2007 (NO 1) (NO 42 OF 2007)
THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR
THE
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
PUBLIC HEALTH
AMENDMENT REGULATION 2007 (NO
1)
SL2007-42
EXPLANATORY
STATEMENT
Minister for Health
PUBLIC HEALTH AMENDMENT REGULATION 2007 (No 1)
The Public Health Amendment Regulation 2007 (No 1) amends the Public Health
Regulation 2000 to remove the size and distance requirements in section 66 of
the Regulation, which concerns the keeping of poultry.
Part 6 of the
Public Health Regulation provides for general sanitation with respect to
animals, birds, water supply and toilets. Currently, section 66 provides that
for domestic birds kept in the city area, defined essentially as the built up
area of the city, the birds must be kept in a yard or run smaller than 20 metres
square for up to 10 birds and an extra 10 metres square for every additional 5
birds. The section also provides that a yard or ruin be no closer than 8 metres
to a home, hospital, or school building. These requirements do not necessarily
prevent insanitary conditions.
As the size and distance requirements
imposes regulatory requirements that do not assist in preventing insanitary
conditions, this regulation is amended to remove the unnecessary requirements.
Public Health Officers will continue to investigate complaints about insanitary
conditions.
The Animal Welfare Act 1992 and the Animal Welfare
(Welfare of Captive Birds Code of Practice) Approval 1995 provide guidance as to
the keeping and welfare of captive birds.
A detailed explanation of each section of the Regulation follows.
The first section of the Regulation specifies that the name of the regulation
is the Public Health Amendment Regulation 2007 (No 1). The Regulation
amends the Public Health Regulation 2000, which is the subordinate law to
the Public Health Act 1997.
Under this section, this Regulation will commence on the day after the date upon which this Regulation is notified on the ACT Legislation Register.
This provision provides that this Regulation amends the Public Health
Regulation 2000.
This section 4 provides that other legislation applies to the
Regulation, in particular the Criminal Code 2002. As section 66 is being
amended, the offence has been drafted consistent with the principles of the
Criminal Code.
Section 5 of this regulation substitutes the current section 66. The
amendment preserves the Chief Health Officer’s ability to give a direction
to a person who keeps domestic birds by expanding the Chief Health
Officer’s power to give a written direction to prevent or remove an
insanitary condition. It is important that if a Public Health Officer is called
to investigate a complaint about a potential insanitary condition that action is
capable of being taken immediately by the Chief Health Officer to avoid the
insanitary condition. Also, the ability to require the removal of an insanitary
condition associated with the domestic birds has been included.
Failure
to comply with the written direction is a strict liability offence. Strict
liability is appropriate as it is a regulatory offence and the person given the
direction is aware of the direction. The person will be advised that failure to
comply with the direction is an offence.