ACT Numbered Regulations - Explanatory Statements ACT Numbered Regulations - Explanatory Statements[Index] [Search] [Download] [Related Items] [Help]
ROAD TRANSPORT (SAFETY AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT) AMENDMENT REGULATION 2010 (NO 1) (NO 38 OF 2010)
2010
THE
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
ROAD TRANSPORT (SAFETY AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT)
AMENDMENT REGULATION 2010 (No 1)
SUBORDINATE LAW
SL2010-38
EXPLANATORY
STATEMENT
Presented by
Mr Jon Stanhope
Minister for
Transport
This regulation is made under section 34 (1) of the Road Transport (Safety
and Traffic Management) Act 1999. It amends the Road Transport (Safety
and Traffic Management) Regulation 2000. The purpose of the regulation is
to implement revised Australian Road Rule 300 (ARR 300), which was amended by a
working group of the National Transport Commission (NTC) in October 2008 and
approved by Transport Ministers voting as the Australian Transport Council (ATC)
on 6 February 2009.
ARR 300 deals with the use of mobile phones by
drivers of motor vehicles. As the NTC Discussion Paper which accompanied the
8th package of amendments to the Australian Road Rules
explains:
“Use of mobile phones by drivers: the Rules
prohibit a driver using a mobile phone while the vehicle is in motion or
stationary but not parked. The Rules apply to a driver holding the phone in the
driver’s hand. It has been identified that some drivers are now holding
the phone between their shoulder and neck. The proposal seeks to clarify the
original intent of the Rules as it applies to mobile phone use by
drivers.”[1]
The NTC Discussion Paper explains at page 25:
“Rule 300 was changed in 2005 with the 5th Amendment Package and now refers to a mobile phone that the driver is holding in his hand rather than the original “hand-held mobile phone”.... This would seem to pick-up on the suggestion made by [a commentator on the amendments] to use the word “hold”.
The proposed rule, although drafted differently to that proposed by [the
commentator] does prohibit “entering data” unless the phone is in a
cradle; however, the proposed rule change goes further in that it also prohibits
the reading of text messages, video messages or e-mails, whether or not the
phone is in a cradle.
Total prohibition was considered and ruled out. Mobile
phones are accepted as a device readily used by today’s community and
keeps [sic] persons in touch in times of need and are also used extensively in
business applications. It was considered the best approach would be to guide
rather than ban their use. It is hoped that education, along with appropriate
enforcement, would see the intent of the rule followed. Future actions may
investigate a total prohibition.”
The amendments in this Regulation
do not create a new offence or alter the existing penalty levels for the
existing offence involving the use of mobile phones and are not considered to
impact on human rights in a different way from the existing the road rule.
Rather, the amendments are to clarify the original intent of ARR 300 to close
inadvertent loopholes.
CLAUSE NOTES
Clause 1 Name of
Regulation
This clause is a formal provision to set out the name of the
regulation.
Clause 2 Commencement
This clause is a formal
provision that sets the commencement of the regulation, which will be the day
after notification on the Legislation Register.
Clause 3 Legislation
amended
This clause explains that the amendments in the regulation apply
to the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Regulation
2000.
Clause 4 New section 6B
This clause inserts new
section 6B into the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Regulation
2000.
New section 6B provides for the substitution of revised ARR 300
with the text approved by the ATC. That text is set out in full enclosed
between quotation marks.
Key concepts such as held and
use are defined in subrule 300 (4). These terms have inclusive
definitions, indicating that they are not intended to be interpreted too
narrowly. Held includes held by or resting on any part of a
person’s body, excluding clothing or items such as pouches worn by the
driver. Use includes holding the phone, entering anything into
the phone otherwise than by voice, turning the phone on or off and operating any
function of the phone. Handing the phone to another person in the car is not
using the phone for the purposes of subrule 300 (4).
In
summation, revised ARR 300 will ensure that a driver cannot:
• use any
part of his or her body to hold a mobile phone while driving (including to
cradle the phone between the person’s head and shoulder or to place it on
the driver’s lap to view the screen);
• use the phone in a
hands-free cradle to make a video-call, email, text message or similar
communication; or
• read automatically-opened communications such as
text messages or emails on mobile phones, whether a phone is in secured in a
cradle or otherwise.
[1] http://www.ntc.gov.au/filemedia/Reports/ARR8thpackagediscussionpaper.pdf
.