Commonwealth of Australia Explanatory Memoranda

[Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]


CRIMINAL CODE AMENDMENT (HAMAS AND LASHKAR-E-TAYYIBA) BILL 2003



2002-2003







THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA





HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES





CRIMINAL CODE AMENDMENT (HAMAS AND LASHKAR-E-TAYYIBA) BILL 2003






EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM











(Circulated by authority of the Attorney-General,
the Honourable Philip Ruddock MP)

CRIMINAL CODE AMENDMENT
(HAMAS AND LASHKAR-E-TAYYIBA) BILL 2003

GENERAL OUTLINE

The Criminal Code Amendment (Hamas and Lashkar-e-Tayyiba) Bill 2003 (the Bill) amends the Criminal Code Act 1995 (the Criminal Code) to enhance the Commonwealth’s ability to combat terrorism.

This Bill creates a basis for the identification and listing of Hamas’ military wing (Izz al-Din al Qassam Brigades) and Lashkar-e-Tayyiba as terrorist organisations under Australian law, if the Minister is satisfied that either or both Hamas’ Izz al-Din al Qassam Brigades and / or Lashkar-e-Tayyiba are engaged in terrorist activities. (Note: the terms ‘Hamas organisation’ and ‘Lashkar-e-Tayyiba organisation’ are used in the Bill to refer to Hamas’ Izz al-Din al Qassam Brigades and / or Lashkar-e-Tayyiba respectively.) The effect of this is to avoid the requirement that an organisation be first identified in, or pursuant to, a decision of the United Nations Security Council relating wholly or partly to terrorism, or using a mechanism established under the decision, as a condition precedent to specifying the organisation in regulations as a terrorist organisation. Neither Hamas’ Izz al-Din al Qassam Brigades or Lashkar-e-Tayyiba have been identified in a relevant decision.

The Bill inserts a provision whereby if either or both organisations are listed in a regulation made under the Bill, and the Minister subsequently ceases to be satisfied that either or both organisations are directly or indirectly engaged in terrorist activity, a declaration to that effect must be made. The result of such a declaration will be that any listing of the relevant organisation will cease to have effect.

Schedule 1 will commence on 5 November 2003, the date the legislation was introduced into the House of Representatives to allow for the retrospective operation of the regulations if necessary. If regulations are made, they could operate retrospectively from the time at which a public announcement is made by a Minister stating the Government’s intention to list either or both the Hamas organisation and / or the Lashkar-e-Tayyiba organisation in regulations.

Financial Impact

It is not expected that the Bill will have a direct financial impact.


NOTES ON CLAUSES

Clause 1: Short Title

This clause is a formal provision specifying the short title of the Bill

Clause 2: Commencement

The Bill when passed will be taken to have commenced on 5 November 2003.

Clause 3: Schedule(s)

Clause 3 provides that each Act specified in a Schedule is amended as set out in the Schedule concerned.

Schedule 1 – Regulations relating to Hamas Organisation and Lashkar-e-Tayyiba Organisation


Item 1 – The Schedule (subsection 102.1(1) of the Criminal Code)

Item 1 inserts a definition of ‘Hamas Organisation’ into subsection 102.1(1). ‘Hamas organisation’ is defined to mean Hamas’ Izz al-Din al Qassam Brigades by whatever name the organisation is known from time to time, and any organisation derived from that organisation.

Item 2 – The Schedule (subsection 102.1(1) of the Criminal Code)

Item 2 inserts a definition of ‘Lashkar-e-Tayyiba Organisation’ into subsection 102.1(1). ‘Lashkar-e-Tayyiba organisation’ is defined to mean the Lashkar-e-Tayyiba Organisation by whatever name the organisation is known from time to time, and any organisation derived from that organisation.

Item 3 – The Schedule (subsection 102.1(1) of the Criminal Code at the end of the definition of terrorist organisation)

Item 3 inserts two new paragraphs into the definition of ‘terrorist organisation’ to include a Hamas organisation (paragraph (c)) and a Lashkar-e-Tayyiba organisation (paragraph (d)) where those organisations have been specified in regulations as terrorist organisations

Item 4 – The Schedule (subsection 102.1(7) of the Criminal Code)

Proposed Subsection 102.1(7)

Item 4 repeals the existing subsection 102.1(7) and replaces it with a new subsection 102.1(7) to enable a Hizballah organisation, a Hamas organisation and / or a Lashkar-e-Tayyiba organisation to be specified in regulations as terrorist organisations if the Minister is satisfied on reasonable grounds that the particular organisation is directly or indirectly engaged in, preparing, planning, assisting in or fostering the doing of a terrorist act, whether or not the terrorist act has occurred or will occur.

It will remain a requirement for the Minister to be satisfied that the relevant organisation is engaged in terrorist activity.

Item 5 – The Schedule (subsection 102.1(8) of the Criminal Code)

Item 5 makes provision for subsection 102.1(8) to apply to a Hamas organisation or a Lashkar-e-Tayyiba organisation. This, in effect, creates a sunset clause that provides that if regulations are made for the purpose of listing either or both organisations as terrorist organisations the regulations will only be valid for two years from the date they are made unless, during that time, the regulations are repealed or otherwise cease to have effect, or new regulations are made which are, in substance, the same.

Item 6 – The Schedule (paragraph 102.1(8)(b) of the Criminal Code)

Item 6 extends the application of paragraph 102.1(8)(b) to include regulations made under the proposed subsection (10A) dealing with a Hamas organisation and proposed subsection (10C) dealing with a Lashkar-e-Tayyiba organisation.

Item 7 – The Schedule (after subsection 102.1(10) of the Criminal Code)

Proposed subsections 102.1(10A) - (10D) insert mechanisms making ineffective a listing of a Hamas organisation or a Lashkar-e-Tayyiba organisation, in the event that the Minister ceases to be satisfied of certain matters, colloquially referred to as ‘de-listing’. In the event that the conditions specified in paragraphs (10A)(a) and (b) and (10C)(a) and (b) are satisfied, subsections 102.1(10A) and 102.1(10C) obliges the Minister to make a declaration, to be published in the Gazette, detailing the matters described in those paragraphs.

This provision requires the Minister to publish a written notice of his or her decision to “de-list” either or both organisations. The regulation(s) will cease to have effect from the date of that declaration. This does not prevent authorities from investigating and, if appropriate, prosecuting for offences committed in relation to either or both organisations (membership of a terrorist organisation; directing activities of a terrorist organisation etc.) where these offences occurred prior to the de-listing of the relevant organisation.

This provision provides the Minister with the ability to make a determination about the suitability of continuing to specify either or both organisations in regulations, which is independent of the initial decision to specify that organisation in regulations, and to “de-list” the organisation where such a course of action is determined by the Minister to be appropriate. These provisions are of course predicated on the Minister making a decision to specify either or both organisations in regulations.

Proposed Subsections 102.1(10B) and (10D)

Proposed subsections 102.1(10B) and 10(D) provide that either or both organisations, if de-listed under subsections 102.1(10A) or (10C), may be subsequently re-listed. This provision takes account of the potentially changing nature of the organisation, in terms of such factors as leadership, organisational aspirations, activity, etc.

Item 8 – The Schedule (after subsection 102.1(11) of the Criminal Code)

Proposed subsections 102.1(11A) and (11B) introduce mechanisms allowing for the listing of either or both organisations in regulations to operate retrospectively, subject to paragraphs 102.1(11A)(a)-(c) and 102.1(11B)(a)-(c), from the time of a public announcement made by the Minister, or another Minister.

Paragraphs (11A)(a) and (11B)(a) ensure that the retrospective operation of the regulation(s) does not pre-empt the decision-making process of the Minister which is required before either or both organisation can be specified in regulations.

Paragraphs (11A)(b) and (11B)(b) then require the Minister to make a public announcement to that effect. The listing of either or both organisations will commence from the time of that announcement. That announcement must also be published on the internet and in major daily newspapers pursuant to subsection 102.1(12).

Paragraphs (11A)(c) and (11B)(c) provide that a regulation specifying either or both organisations to be a terrorist organisation must be made within 60 days of the day on which the Act receives Royal Assent in order for it to operate retrospectively from the date of the announcement for the purposes of the subsection. Paragraphs (11A)(c) and (11B)(c) effectively operate as sunset clauses, limiting the period of time in which regulations with retrospective application can be made to 60 days after Royal Assent.

Item 9 – The Schedule (subsection 102.1(12) of the Criminal Code)

Item 9 makes provision for subsection 102.1(12) to apply to a Hamas organisation ((11A)(b)) or a Lashkar-e-Tayyiba organisation ((11B)(b)).

Subsection 102.1(12) requires that any announcement made regarding the listing of the Hizballah organisation, the Hamas organisation and / or the Lashkar-e-Tayyiba organisation must be published on the Internet and in a newspaper circulating in each State and the Northern Territory if the listing is to take effect from the date of the announcement rather than from the date the relevant regulations are made.

Item 10 – The Schedule (subsection 102.1(13) of the Criminal Code)

Item 10 makes provision for subsection 102.1(13) to apply to a Hamas organisation (paragraph 10A) or a Lashkar-e-Tayyiba organisation (paragraph 10C) in the same way it applies to a Hizballah organisation (paragraph 9).

Subsection 102.1(13) provides that, if a regulation ceases to have effect as a result of this section, section 50 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 applies.   This means that, in the event a regulation ceases to have effect pursuant to this section, certain matters, consequent upon the operation of that regulation while in force and necessary for the proper operation of the regulation, will not be affected despite the regulation subsequently ceasing to have effect.

Item 11 – The Schedule (at the end of section 102.1 of the Criminal Code)

Proposed Subsections 102.1(15) and (16)

Item 11 provides that both a Hamas organisation and a Lashkar-e-Tayyiba organisation can still be listed as terrorist organisations under the existing paragraph (b) in the definition of a terrorist organisation.

The provision ensures that the scope of operation of paragraph 102.1(1)(b) is not diminished in relation to its potential applicability to either or both organisations, notwithstanding that paragraphs 102.1(1)(d) and (e) (definition of terrorist organisation) apply exclusively to the organisations respectively. That is, paragraphs 102.1(1)(d) and (e) are not intended to constitute the sole mechanism by which either or both organisations might be identified as a terrorist organisation for the purposes of section 102.1.

Item 12 – The Schedule (paragraph 102.3(1)(b) of the Criminal Code)

This item ensures that paragraph 102.3(1)(b) in relation to terrorist organisation membership offences applies to a Hamas organisation (paragraph (d)) and a Lashkar-e-Tayyiba organisation (paragraph (e)) in the same way it applies to a Hizballah organisation (paragraph (c)).

 


[Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]