Commonwealth Consolidated Acts

[Index] [Table] [Search] [Search this Act] [Notes] [Noteup] [Previous] [Next] [Download] [Help]

SECURITY OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE ACT 2018 - SECT 35AB

Ministerial authorisation

Scope

  (1)   This section applies if the Minister is satisfied that:

  (a)   a cyber security incident:

  (i)   has occurred; or

  (ii)   is occurring; or

  (iii)   is imminent; and

  (b)   the incident has had, is having, or is likely to have, a relevant impact on a critical infrastructure asset (the primary asset ); and

  (c)   there is a material risk that the incident has seriously prejudiced, is seriously prejudicing, or is likely to seriously prejudice:

  (i)   the social or economic stability of Australia or its people; or

  (ii)   the defence of Australia; or

  (iii)   national security; and

  (d)   no existing regulatory system of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory could be used to provide a practical and effective response to the incident.

  (1A)   This section also applies if the Minister is satisfied that:

  (a)   a cyber security incident:

  (i)   has occurred; or

  (ii)   is occurring; or

  (iii)   is imminent; and

  (b)   the incident has had, is having, or is likely to have, a relevant impact on a critical infrastructure asset (the primary asset ); and

  (c)   the incident relates to an emergency specified in a national emergency declaration (within the meaning of the National Emergency Declaration Act 2020 ) that is in force; and

  (d)   no existing regulatory system of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory could be used to provide a practical and effective response to the incident.

Authorisation

  (2)   The Minister may, on application by the Secretary, do any or all of the following things:

  (a)   authorise the Secretary to give directions to a specified entity under section   35AK that relate to the incident and the primary asset;

  (b)   authorise the Secretary to give directions to a specified entity under section   35AK that relate to the incident and a specified critical infrastructure sector asset;

  (c)   authorise the Secretary to give to a specified entity a specified direction under section   35AQ that relates to the incident and the primary asset;

  (d)   authorise the Secretary to give to a specified entity a specified direction under section   35AQ that relates to the incident and a specified critical infrastructure sector asset;

  (e)   authorise the Secretary to give a specified request under section   35AX that relates to the incident and the primary asset;

  (f)   authorise the Secretary to give a specified request under section   35AX that relates to the incident and a specified critical infrastructure sector asset.

Note 1:   Section   35AK deals with information gathering directions.

Note 2:   Section   35AQ deals with action directions.

Note 3:   Section   35AX deals with intervention requests.

  (3)   An authorisation under subsection   (2) is to be known as a Ministerial authorisation .

  (4)   Subsection   33(3AB) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 does not apply to subsection   (2) of this section.

Note:   Subsection   33(3AB) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 deals with specification by class.

Information gathering directions

  (5)   A Ministerial authorisation under paragraph   (2)(a) or (b):

  (a)   is generally applicable to the incident and the asset concerned; and

  (b)   is to be made without reference to any specific directions.

  (6)   The Minister must not give a Ministerial authorisation under paragraph   (2)(a) or (b) unless the Minister is satisfied that the directions that could be authorised by the Ministerial authorisation are likely to facilitate a practical and effective response to the incident.

Action directions

  (7)   The Minister must not give a Ministerial authorisation under paragraph   (2)(c) or (d) unless the Minister is satisfied that:

  (a)   the specified entity is unwilling or unable to take all reasonable steps to respond to the incident; and

  (b)   the specified direction is reasonably necessary for the purposes of responding to the incident; and

  (c)   the specified direction is a proportionate response to the incident; and

  (d)   compliance with the specified direction is technically feasible.

Note:   Section   12P provides examples of responding to a cyber security incident.

  (8)   In determining whether the specified direction is a proportionate response to the incident, the Minister must have regard to:

  (a)   the impact of the specified direction on:

  (i)   the activities carried on by the specified entity; and

  (ii)   the functioning of the asset concerned; and

  (b)   the consequences of compliance with the specified direction; and

  (c)   such other matters (if any) as the Minister considers relevant.

  (9)   The Minister must not give a Ministerial authorisation under paragraph   (2)(c) or (d) if the specified direction:

  (a)   requires the specified entity to permit the authorised agency to do an act or thing that could be the subject of a request under section   35AX; or

  (b)   requires the specified entity to take offensive cyber action against a person who is directly or indirectly responsible for the incident.

Intervention requests

  (10)   The Minister must not give a Ministerial authorisation under paragraph   (2)(e) or (f) unless the Minister is satisfied that:

  (a)   giving a Ministerial authorisation under paragraph   (2)(c) or (d) would not amount to a practical and effective response to the incident; and

  (b)   if there is only one relevant entity for the asset concerned--the relevant entity is unwilling or unable to take all reasonable steps to respond to the incident; and

  (c)   if there are 2 or more relevant entities for the asset concerned--those entities, when considered together, are unwilling or unable to take all reasonable steps to respond to the incident; and

  (d)   the specified request is reasonably necessary for the purposes of responding to the incident; and

  (e)   the specified request is a proportionate response to the incident; and

  (f)   compliance with the specified request is technically feasible; and

  (g)   each of the acts or things specified in the specified request is an act or thing of a kind covered by section   35AC.

Note:   Section   12P provides examples of responding to a cyber security incident.

  (11)   In determining whether the specified request is a proportionate response to the incident, the Minister must have regard to:

  (a)   the impact of compliance with the specified request on the functioning of the asset concerned; and

  (b)   the consequences of acts or things that would be done in compliance with the specified request; and

  (c)   such other matters (if any) as the Minister considers relevant.

  (12)   The Minister must not give a Ministerial authorisation under paragraph   (2)(e) or (f) if compliance with the specified request would involve the authorised agency taking offensive cyber action against a person who is directly or indirectly responsible for the incident.

  (13)   The Minister must not give a Ministerial authorisation under paragraph   (2)(e) or (f) unless the Minister has obtained the agreement of:

  (a)   the Prime Minister; and

  (b)   the Defence Minister.

  (14)   An agreement under subsection   (13) may be given:

  (a)   orally; or

  (b)   in writing.

  (15)   If an agreement under subsection   (13) is given orally, the Prime Minister or the Defence Minister, as the case requires, must:

  (a)   do both of the following:

  (i)   make a written record of the agreement;

  (ii)   give a copy of the written record of the agreement to the Minister; and

  (b)   do so within 48 hours after the agreement is given.

Ministerial authorisation is not a legislative instrument

  (16)   A Ministerial authorisation is not a legislative instrument.

Other powers not limited

  (17)   This section does not, by implication, limit a power conferred by another provision of this Act.



AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback