Commonwealth Numbered Regulations
[Index]
[Table]
[Search]
[Search this Regulation]
[Notes]
[Noteup]
[Previous]
[Download]
[Help]
COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND THE ARTS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (APPLICATION OF CRIMINAL CODE) REGULATIONS 2001 (NO. 1) 2001 NO. 337 - SCHEDULE 5
Amendments of Telecommunications (Arbitration) Regulations
(regulation 7)
[1] Regulation 1
substitute
1 Name of Regulations
These Regulations are the Telecommunications (Arbitration) Regulations 1997 .
[2] Regulation 21
substitute
21 Failure to attend as witness
- (1)
- A
person who:
- (a)
- is summoned under regulation 17 to attend an arbitration
hearing; and
- (b)
- has not been excused, or released from further attendance, by a member of
the ACCC for the arbitration;
must attend the hearing as required by the summons.
Penalty:
10 penalty
units.
- (2)
- Strict liability applies to subregulation (1).
- (3)
- It is a defence to a prosecution for an offence against subregulation (1)
if the person had a reasonable excuse.
Note
A defendant bears an evidential
burden in relation to the question whether he or she had a reasonable excuse
(see section 13.3 of the Criminal Code ).
[3] Regulation 22
substitute
22 Failure to answer questions etc
- (1)
- A witness at an
arbitration hearing must not:
- (a)
- fail to be sworn or to make an
affirmation; or
- (b)
- fail to answer a question that the witness is required by the ACCC to
answer; or
- (c)
- fail to produce a document that the witness is required to produce by a
summons under paragraph 17 (1) (b).
Penalty:
10 penalty units.
- (2)
- Without limiting subregulation (4),
paragraph (1) (b) or
- (c)
- does not require a witness to answer a
question or produce a document if the answer or the production of the document
might tend to incriminate the witness or expose him or her to a penalty.
- (3)
- Strict liability applies to subregulation (1).
- (4)
- It is a defence to a prosecution for an offence against subregulation (1)
if the witness had a reasonable excuse.
Note
A defendant bears an evidential
burden in relation to the question whether he or she had a reasonable excuse
(see section 13.3 of the Criminal Code ).
[4] Regulations 23 and 24
omit
[5] Subregulation 25 (2)
substitute
- (2)
- A person must not engage
in conduct that:
- (a)
- threatens, intimidates, or coerces a person mentioned
in subregulation (1); or
- (b)
- causes damage, disadvantage or loss to the person.
Penalty:
10 penalty units.
- (3)
- Strict liability applies to the physical
element in paragraph (2) (a) that the person is a person mentioned
in subregulation (1).
AustLII: Copyright Policy
| Disclaimers
| Privacy Policy
| Feedback