New South Wales Consolidated Acts
[Index]
[Table]
[Search]
[Search this Act]
[Notes]
[Noteup]
[Previous]
[Next]
[Download]
[History]
[Help]
CRIMINAL APPEAL ACT 1912 - SECT 6AA
Appeal against sentence may be heard by 2 judges
6AA Appeal against sentence may be heard by 2 judges
(1) The Chief Justice may direct that proceedings under this Act on an appeal
(including proceedings on an application for leave to appeal) against a
sentence be heard and determined by such 2 judges of the Supreme Court as the
Chief Justice directs.
(2) Such a direction may only be given if the Chief
Justice is of the opinion that the appeal is not likely to require the
resolution of a disputed issue of general principle.
(3) For the purposes of
proceedings the subject of a direction under this section, the Court of
Criminal Appeal is constituted by the 2 judges directed by the Chief Justice.
(4) The decision of the court when constituted by 2 judges is to be in
accordance with the opinion of those judges.
(5) If the judges are divided in
opinion-- (a) as to the decision determining the proceedings, the proceedings
are to be reheard and determined by the court constituted by such 3 judges as
the Chief Justice directs (including, if practicable, the 2 judges who first
heard the proceedings on appeal), or
(b) as to any other decision, the
decision of the court is to be in accordance with the opinion of the senior
judge present.
(6) Proceedings heard by the court constituted by 2 judges
under this section are rendered abortive for the purposes of section 6A (1)
(a1) of the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 if they are required to be reheard because
the judges were divided in opinion as to the decision determining the
proceedings. The rehearing of the proceedings is considered to be a new trial
for the purposes of that Act.
AustLII: Copyright Policy
| Disclaimers
| Privacy Policy
| Feedback