Queensland Consolidated Acts
[Index]
[Table]
[Search]
[Search this Act]
[Notes]
[Noteup]
[Previous]
[Next]
[Download]
[Help]
CRIMINAL PROCEEDS CONFISCATION ACT 2002 - SECT 93ZK
Supreme Court may exclude prescribed respondent’s property from restraining order
93ZK Supreme Court may exclude prescribed respondent’s property from
restraining order
(1) The prescribed respondent under the restraining order may apply to the
Supreme Court to amend the order to exclude particular property of the
prescribed respondent from the order.
(2) The prescribed respondent must give
written notice of the making of the application, the grounds for the
application and the facts relied on to the State and anyone else who has an
interest in the property.
(3) The grounds for the application and the facts
relied on must be stated fully in the notice.
(4) The State must be a party
to the application.
(5) Anyone else who is given notice of the application
may appear at the hearing of the application.
(6) If the State proposes to
oppose the application, the State must give the applicant notice of intention
to oppose the application.
(7) The State must give the applicant notice of
the grounds for opposing the application.
(8) However— (a) the State is not
required to give the notice; and
(b) the application may not be heard;
until
the DPP has had a reasonable opportunity to examine the applicant or a
relevant person under an examination order, whether or not an examination
order has already been made.
(9) In this section—
"relevant person" means a person other than the applicant who, on examination
under an examination order, may be able to give evidence relevant to the
application.
AustLII: Copyright Policy
| Disclaimers
| Privacy Policy
| Feedback