47—Effect of non-compliance on admissibility of evidence
(1) If a
police officer or other person with responsibilities under this Act (other
than a person acting as an appropriate representative of a protected person
under this Act) contravenes a requirement of this Act in relation to—
(a) a
forensic procedure; or
(b)
forensic material obtained from a forensic procedure; or
(c) a
DNA profile derived from such forensic material,
evidence obtained as a result of the forensic procedure is not admissible in
evidence against the person on whom the procedure was carried out
unless—
(d) the
person does not object to the admission of the evidence; or
(e) the
court is satisfied that the evidence should be admitted in the interests of
the proper administration of justice despite the contravention.
(2) In deciding
whether evidence should be admitted in the interests of the proper
administration of justice, the court must have regard to the following
matters:
(a) the
probative value of the evidence;
(b) the
seriousness of the contravention and, in particular, whether it was
intentional or reckless;
(c) the
extent to which the defendant has been prejudiced by the contravention;
(d) any
other relevant factors.
(3) Evidence obtained
by carrying out a volunteers and victims procedure on a person is inadmissible
in any criminal proceedings against that person if, by the time the question
of its admissibility arises, the forensic material obtained from the procedure
should have been destroyed.