(1) Application may be made to the Administrative Review Tribunal for a review of a decision by the Secretary:
(a) to refuse to approve a transport security program under subsection 19(2) or (4); or
(b) to direct a participant to vary a program under section 21; or
(c) to direct a participant to revise a program under section 23; or
(ca) to refuse to approve alterations of a program under section 23A; or
(d) to cancel a transport security program under section 25 or 26; or
(da) to give a participant a transport security program under section 26B (including a revised transport security program as referred to in section 26F); or
(db) to cancel a transport security program under section 26F or 26G; or
(dc) to refuse to cancel a transport security program under section 26H; or
(e) to declare that a particular airport, or a part of a particular airport, is a security controlled airport under subsection 28(2); or
(ea) to assign a category to a particular security controlled airport under subsection 28(6); or
(f) to determine under subsection 74G(1) that a person has an adverse aviation security status.
(2) To avoid doubt, paragraph (1)(f) does not permit the Administrative Review Tribunal to review an adverse security assessment or a qualified security assessment other than in accordance with the provisions of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 and the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 .
(3) In subsection (2):
"adverse security assessment" and qualified security assessment have the same meanings as in the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.
Note: Section 266 of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 requires the decision - maker to notify persons whose interests are affected by the decision of the making of the decision and their right to have the decision reviewed. In so notifying, the decision - maker must have regard to the matters (if any) prescribed by rules made under that Act.