Scope
(1) This section applies to a restructuring practitioner appointed under subsection 456E(1) otherwise than by the Court.
Declaration of relationships
(2) As soon as practicable after being appointed, the restructuring practitioner must make a declaration of relevant relationships.
Note: Failure to comply with this subsection is an offence (see subsection 1311(1)).
Notification of creditors
(3) The restructuring practitioner must:
(a) give a copy of the declaration under subsection (2) to as many of the company's creditors as reasonably practicable; and
(b) do so at the same time as notice of the appointment is given under section 457A.
Note: Failure to comply with this subsection is an offence (see subsection 1311(1)).
(4) As soon as practicable after making a declaration under subsection (2), the restructuring practitioner must lodge a copy of the declaration with ASIC.
Note: Failure to comply with this subsection is an offence (see subsection 1311(1)).
Updating of declaration
(5) If:
(a) at a particular time, the restructuring practitioner makes a declaration of relevant relationships under subsection (2) or this subsection; and
(b) at a later time:
(i) the declaration has become out - of - date; or
(ii) the restructuring practitioner becomes aware of an error in the declaration;
the restructuring practitioner must, as soon as practicable, make a replacement declaration of relevant relationships.
Note: Failure to comply with this subsection is an offence (see subsection 1311(1)).
(6) As soon as practicable after making a replacement declaration under subsection (5), the restructuring practitioner must lodge a copy of the replacement declaration with ASIC.
Note: Failure to comply with this subsection is an offence (see subsection 1311(1)).
Defence
(7) In a prosecution for an offence constituted by a failure to include a particular matter in a declaration under this section, it is a defence if the defendant proves that:
(a) the defendant made reasonable enquiries; and
(b) after making these enquiries, the defendant had no reasonable grounds for believing that the matter should have been included in the declaration.